Does the U.S. Need a Regime Change?

"In 2016, I'm going to leave it all out on the field. Wherever there's an opportunity, I'm going to take it." ~ Obama

The idea of regime changes did not start on Obama's watch, and the evil dictators who must be removed from power were not always evil dictators. There is sufficient information to research regarding the history of U.S. relations with various countries and their leaders. The U.S. has been instrumental in bringing many of these supposed mad men to power, then later calling for a regime change, and the eventual destruction of their one time allies.

So what changes? Like other matters of money, resources, and power influences, when a player is no longer needed, or when they are conveniently needed for other purposes, they are declared an evil dictator and become expendable. I'm not going to rehash all the specific histories and examples of U.S. betrayal and global manipulation. What?!? U.S. betrayal and global manipulation? Is the U.S. in need of a regime change?




No doubt, we could justify prosecuting a long list of players, but typically we focus on a country's leader when discussing regime changes, with the understanding that when the dictator goes, so does his support mechanisms. I'm not certain it would play out that favorably in a U.S. regime change. I'm not talking about the winning and losing of elections, and the power swinging left and right or vice versa. Even with the changing of the executive, and a few shifts in congressional and senate seats, the monster of the support base remains intact and the new executive conveniently forgets his promises while picking up where the last executive left off.

We can certainly address the executive actions of previous presidents, but no U.S. president has taken a more dictatorial role than president Obama. He has bypassed congress on numerous occasions and continually threatens to do so going forward. In a recent press conference, Obama said, "In 2016, I'm going to leave it all out on the field. Wherever there's an opportunity, I'm going to take it."

"In 2016, I'm going to leave it all out on the field. Wherever there's an opportunity, I'm going to take it."

 http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/obama-hold-year-end-news-conference-hawaii-getaway-35836152

His past record proves what he intends with such a statement. He boldly accuses congress of being too galvanized and uses it as an excuse to use dictatorial powers via executive actions. In his recent press conference, he once again reiterated that when congress is stymied, he will use executive action to get results.

Congress is supposed to get stymied. It is not supposed to be easy to just whip through legislation in a cavalier manner. There are many fail safes built into our government so that no one branch is running amok with our liberties. Our founding fathers did not sit around smiling and agreeing. They argued and fought among themselves, sometimes leading to duels for having their honor and integrity challenged. Oh, the good 'ol days!

Obama is cavalier. He sees a deadlocked congress as a hindrance to progression, when in reality it is a protection from regression. A fast moving government will quickly bring a country full circle to the tyranny it once fought to rid it's self of. Obama is running out of time. He has one year to hammer the last nails into the coffin of a once free republic.

One of his top priorities in his last year is gun control measures, and he has cavalierly announced he will use executive action (dictatorial powers) to do it. His words are basically ultimatums to congress. His message is, do something or I will do it. It is deeper than that. He is not just looking for congress to do something. He is insisting that congress do it his way, or he will veto and do it his way. He is determined, he will dictate gun control measures to his liking, the people and their representatives be damned.

The powers that be have been very effective in dumbing down America with the 'bread and circus syndrome'. Keep the people sufficiently fed and entertained, and they will not bother with the important matters of their life's governing. You can read more about that here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bread_and_circuses

This once great republic has traded it's liberties for food and entertainment while a dictator operates unchecked. Some of our young people are very aware, but our youth has largely become a generation of Bliss Ninnies, believing the propaganda that government intends to nurture and care for them. Beef cows and chickens are nurtured before being slaughtered and consumed. Even a flock of sheep will try to avoid the wolves, but if they are solely focused on their daily grazing, the wolves will easily devour them.

The constitution is being shredded by the dictator in the White House, and elections will not fix it. The left wing extremists have successfully commandeered this ship by way of a long and stealthy mutiny. Are we in need of a regime change? These things are usually violent affairs. Are you prepared for violence? What are your other best options? All of the usual methods of righting the ship are failing and the ship is going down.

If this Republic is to survive, the constitution must be preserved by any means necessary. Only three per cent of the population fought in the revolutionary war. We are well aware of the one per cent who make up the global elitists. We are talking about seven billion inhabitants of earth being controlled and manipulated by thousands. There is no dictator or group of dictators who can survive a rebellion of seven billion united.

Let's keep it local for this discussion. A handful of dictators cannot stand against 300 million united Americans. Reach out to the Bliss Ninnies. Be bold, courageous, and unintimidated by the ignorant masses. Challenge them with the constitution and shame them for their ignorance. Maybe a regime change begins at home. If you aren't willing to be the same proud American every day that you are on the fourth of July, then you are just another Bliss Ninnie.